ACCU Home page ACCU Conference Page
Search Contact us ACCU at Flickr ACCU at GitHib ACCU at Google+ ACCU at Facebook ACCU at Linked-in ACCU at Twitter Skip Navigation

Search in Book Reviews

The ACCU passes on review copies of computer books to its members for them to review. The result is a large, high quality collection of book reviews by programmers, for programmers. Currently there are 1918 reviews in the database and more every month.
Search is a simple string search in either book title or book author. The full text search is a search of the text of the review.
    View all alphabetically
Title:
Web Design Tools&Techniques
Author:
Peter Kentie
ISBN:
0 201 71712 3
Publisher:
Peachpit
Pages:
436
Price:
£29-99
Reviewer:
Christopher Hill
Subject:
internet
Appeared in:
16-4
As I was reading this book the saying "Jack of all trades - master of none" kept running through my head.

44 'chapters' in 436 pages - with a chapter on Java programming, another on JavaScript, and another on Shockwave Movies - you begin to get the idea that this book dips a toe into just about every tool and/or technique that the author could find.

This is a second edition, published in 2002, yet the impression I get is of a much older book. The chapters on HTML talk of the problems of Internet Explorer 2, and that nearly all browsers' work to HTML version 3.0 - HTML 4.1 was released in 1999!

There are examples of very bad style; of using a fixed template so that you can use H2 for document title and B for sub-headings.

There are many errors; suggesting that ROWSPAN and COLSPAN attributes can be used in TR elements; or if you want larger coloured text you use two FONT tags and only one closing /FONT tag; much of the HTML is not well formed.

The first tool that the author suggests that budding web designers might use is Microsoft Word 2000, which is generally recognised to produce very bloated HTML.

This is an old book with a little editing and a few more recent tools added to produce the second edition, which tries to address too many topics. Not recommended.